Posted here. Takeaway? “… a short book with a big punch.”
Similar Posts
Interview with Dave Black on Why Four Gospels
https://youtu.be/vW4mYR-h95g (must be watched on YouTube).
Posted here. Takeaway? “… a short book with a big punch.”
10:41 AM On dispensing with “Q”: One problem that arises is that of the existence of Q. We cannot confront this issue here, for the complexity of such a task would be significant enough to warrant a book of its own. However, as we have seen, the Fourfold-Gospel Hypothesis permits us to dispose with Q…
This review is of the previous edition, but should nonetheless be helpful.
7:47 AM Mark as the interpres of Peter: Indeed, it is the modern critics, blinded by their conviction of the priority of Mark, who have failed to accept the obvious message of the patristic evidence. That is why they have misunderstood the significance of the texts that always describe the disciple Mark as the go-between…
Ivan Monroy reviews the previous edition of Why Four Gospels?
Read notes by Dave Black at The Jesus Paradigm.
https://youtu.be/vW4mYR-h95g (must be watched on YouTube).