Posted here. Takeaway? “… a short book with a big punch.”
Similar Posts
Ivan Monroy Review
ByhneufeldIvan Monroy reviews the previous edition of Why Four Gospels?
On Dispensing with Q
Byhneufeld10:41 AM On dispensing with “Q”: One problem that arises is that of the existence of Q. We cannot confront this issue here, for the complexity of such a task would be significant enough to warrant a book of its own. However, as we have seen, the Fourfold-Gospel Hypothesis permits us to dispose with Q…
Making a Reading List
ByhneufeldAt Energion Publications we like the blogosphere, and we like to see our books on people’s reading lists. Why Four Gospels? is one of Five Books I Liked This Year from The Savannah Project.
Mark as an Enabling Document
Byhneufeld6:57 PM Mark as an enabling document: Matthew is the fundamental Gospel and the most important, but each was written and published in response to a particular need of the church in a particular historical situation. The real significance of Mark lies in Peter’s guarantee that Luke was fit to be read beside Matthew in…
Brian Fulthorp Reviews Why Four Gospels
ByhneufeldHis conclusion: I heartily recommend this book to any person lay or scholar who is interested in Gospel and or Synoptic studies – if you are for Markan priority I think it is even more important you read this book – why? Because too often Markan priority people make comments like the quote I gave…