Posted here. Takeaway? “… a short book with a big punch.”
Similar Posts
Review at A Living Sacrifice
ByhneufeldThere’s a nice, and exceptionally readable, review of Why Four Gospels? at A Living Sacrifice. I don’t usually comment on our blog reviewers, because bloggers must be free to review as they see fit, but in this case I make an exception. I’m not talking about the review being positive (which it is), but about…
Mark as an Enabling Document
Byhneufeld6:57 PM Mark as an enabling document: Matthew is the fundamental Gospel and the most important, but each was written and published in response to a particular need of the church in a particular historical situation. The real significance of Mark lies in Peter’s guarantee that Luke was fit to be read beside Matthew in…
Brian Fulthorp Reviews Why Four Gospels
ByhneufeldHis conclusion: I heartily recommend this book to any person lay or scholar who is interested in Gospel and or Synoptic studies – if you are for Markan priority I think it is even more important you read this book – why? Because too often Markan priority people make comments like the quote I gave…
On David Alan Black at Shepherd’s Theological Seminary
ByhneufeldThomas Hudgins was there and comments.
James A. Lee
ByhneufeldJames A. Lee at Deliver Detroit reviews Why Four Gospels? A sample: With the prevalence of evangelical dismissal of anything common to the 1st century or pre-reformation thought concerning the order and historicity of Church life, or documents, this book comes as a challenge to the dismissal of Patristic witness concerning the chronological order of…
Review at Thinking in Christ
ByhneufeldThis review is of the previous edition, but should nonetheless be helpful.