Posted here. Takeaway? “… a short book with a big punch.”
Similar Posts
Mark Presents Peter
Byhneufeld7:47 AM Mark as the interpres of Peter: Indeed, it is the modern critics, blinded by their conviction of the priority of Mark, who have failed to accept the obvious message of the patristic evidence. That is why they have misunderstood the significance of the texts that always describe the disciple Mark as the go-between…
On Dispensing with Q
Byhneufeld10:41 AM On dispensing with “Q”: One problem that arises is that of the existence of Q. We cannot confront this issue here, for the complexity of such a task would be significant enough to warrant a book of its own. However, as we have seen, the Fourfold-Gospel Hypothesis permits us to dispose with Q…
Arthur Sido Review
ByhneufeldArthur Sido provides a very positive review at The Voice of One Crying Out in Suburbia.
Alan Know Review
ByhneufeldHis conclusion? So, buy and read Why Four Gospels? Even if you do not agree with Black, it will at least be a good example of how to write on a difficult subject in a way that almost all readers will understand. Read the rest …
Charles Savelle Review
Byhneufeld… is available at BibleX.
New Review at Homo Homini Lupus
ByadminRobert Stump reviews David Alan Black’s book Why Four Gospels? on his Homo Homini Lupus blog. Two portions stand out: The greatness of Black’s little book is its common sense. That it has taken so many years for someone of Black’s prestige to stand up and point out the silliness is too bad; that it…